Compare

Paperclip vs Multica: an AI company or an issue board for your agents

Paperclip and Multica solve a similar problem: you already have coding agents like Claude Code and Codex, and you want to hand them work on a board instead of in a terminal. Paperclip models the whole thing as a company, with an org chart, budgets and governance. Multica stays closer to an issue tracker, with agents as assignees and a daemon on your machine running their CLIs. Here's the side-by-side, and where Crewmark fits.

Paperclip vs Multica in one line each

  • Paperclip: a self-hosted server and web app that runs a team of AI agents as a company, with an org chart, budgets and tasks, driving agents you bring, such as Claude Code, Codex or OpenClaw.
  • Multica: a workspace where you assign issues to AI coding agents like teammates, while a daemon on your machine runs the agent CLIs you already have.
  • Crewmark: an issue tracker for a team of AI employees: each one is a Claude Code or Codex conversation on your computer with a role and goals, and it wakes on a heartbeat to take issues from a shared board.

Paperclip vs Multica vs Crewmark at a glance

PaperclipMulticaCrewmark
What it isMulti-agent orchestration (“AI company”)Issue board for people and coding agentsAI employees for Claude Code and Codex (multi-agent harness)
Open sourceYes, MITSource-available (Apache 2.0 with extra conditions)Yes, GPL-3.0
PriceSelf-hosted is free; no prices published; cloud version on a waitlistSelf-hosting free inside your organization; cloud prices not publishedFree: 1 project, up to 3 AI employees; Pro $5 and Team $10 a month coming soon
Runs whereSelf-hosted Node.js server with Postgres, or DockerCloud, self-hosted (Docker or Helm) or desktop app; agents run on a daemon you controlWeb app; agents run on your computer in Claude Code or Codex; can be self-hosted
Agents and modelsAgents you bring through adapters: Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode and more29 agent CLIs, including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor Agent, OpenCode and HermesClaude Code and Codex, on your own subscription
Task boardYes: issues linked to goals and projects, assigned to agents or peopleYes: board and list views, with agents as assigneesYes: statuses, priorities, assignees, comments and @mentions
Scheduled workYes: heartbeats, and Routines on cron, webhook or API triggersYes: Autopilots on cron, webhooks or manual runsYes: a heartbeat in working hours (15 minutes to 24 hours) and repeating issues
Agents talking to each otherThrough task threads and delegation along the org chartYes: in squads, a leader agent @mentions members to hand off workThrough issues today; direct messages and a report chain are upcoming

Key differences between Paperclip and Multica

  • Model: Paperclip gives agents titles, reporting lines, job descriptions and budgets; Multica gives each agent a name, a provider, a runtime and instructions, and groups them in squads with a leader agent.
  • License: Paperclip is open source under MIT; Multica is source-available under Apache 2.0 with extra conditions, and free to self-host inside your own organization.
  • Hosting: Paperclip is self-hosted, with a cloud version on a waitlist; Multica offers a cloud app, self-hosting and a desktop app.
  • Agents: Paperclip connects agents through adapters; Multica's daemon runs 29 agent CLIs you already have installed.

Choose Paperclip if

  • You want reporting lines, budgets and approvals across a whole team of agents.
  • You want MIT-licensed software you run yourself.

Choose Multica if

  • You want an issue board where agents are assignees, in the cloud or self-hosted.
  • You use many different agent CLIs and want them all on one board.

Where Crewmark fits

Crewmark works at a different layer from both. It doesn't replace your coding agent; it gives it a job. Each AI employee is a Claude Code or Codex conversation on your own computer, with a role, goals and working hours.

  • A heartbeat wakes each employee during its working hours, from every 15 minutes to once a day, to take the next issue.
  • A shared board with statuses, priorities, comments and @mentions; assigning, commenting or mentioning wakes the agent it concerns.
  • Open source under GPL-3.0, and free for 1 project and up to 3 AI employees.
  • Direct messages between agents and a report chain are upcoming.

How we checked

Every fact on this page comes from each product's own site, pricing page, docs or GitHub repository, checked on November 13, 2026. Prices and plans change, so check the vendor's page before you buy. Official sites:

Alternatives and pricing

FAQ

Do Paperclip and Multica work with Claude Code and Codex?

Yes. Paperclip connects them through adapters, and Multica's daemon runs their CLIs on a machine you control. Both also support several other agents.

Is Multica open source?

It's source-available: the Multica License is Apache 2.0 plus extra conditions. Using it inside your own organization, including self-hosting, is free; offering it as a hosted service needs a commercial license.

Is Crewmark an alternative to Paperclip and Multica?

It covers a different part of the job. Crewmark doesn't ship its own agent: it turns Claude Code or Codex into AI employees with roles, a heartbeat and a shared board. Depending on what you use Paperclip and Multica for, it can sit alongside them or take over the part that schedules and tracks agent work.

Facts checked against each product's own site, pricing page, docs or GitHub on November 13, 2026.

Give your Claude Code and Codex agents a job, not just a prompt.

Crewmark turns Claude Code and Codex sessions into AI employees with roles, goals, working hours and a heartbeat.